Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGoytia, Cynthia
dc.contributor.authorDorna, Guadalupe
dc.coverage.spatialArgentinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-23T19:11:46Z
dc.date.available2016-11-23T19:11:46Z
dc.date.issued2016-11
dc.identifier.citationGoytia, C., & Dorna, G. (2016, November). What is the Role of Urban Growth on Inequality, and Segregation? The Case of Urban Argentina´s Urban Agglomerations. Working paper;N° 2016/12, Buenos Aires: CAF. Retrieved from https://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/972en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/972
dc.description.tableofcontentsWe analyze the relationship between urban sprawl and changing patterns of inequality and segregation in metropolitan areas of Argentina. The existing literature has endeavored to study the determinants of the expansion of cities, but less attention has been placed in understanding the effects of this sprawl on the livelihood of the people that live in them. Understanding whether different patterns of urban extension determine both segregation and inequality is extremely relevant in the context of fast growing urban agglomerates of Latin American countries. Among other findings, we provide evidence that there is segregation of the poor and not of the rich in all urban agglomerates but in Greater Buenos Aires, where segregation of the affluent, not the poor, prevails in the areas of greater informal urban expansion, measured by the extension of informal settlements. Yet, not all the patterns of urban development and built-up growth have the same effect. More leapfrog appears to explain greater segregation -particularly of the poor- while both infill and extension are positively related to more homogeneous urban agglomerations. This means that the most disadvantaged are more evenly distributed in agglomerations that have not seen much of their sprawl due to discontinue urban expansion of their borders. Finally, we also find a positive association between more unequal municipalities and greater slum expansions. The causality of this relationship is unclear and further analysis could be promising. It might be the case that more unequal municipalities allow for institutional environments in which slums can grow faster. Or it might well be that places which have experienced more accelerated slum growth have become more unequal because of the arrival of new families that accentuates such disparities.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCAFen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper;N° 2016/12
dc.rightsCC-BY-NCes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/es_ES
dc.subjectCiudadesen_US
dc.subjectDesarrollo socialen_US
dc.subjectDesarrollo urbanoen_US
dc.subjectEconomíaen_US
dc.subjectEquidad e inclusión socialen_US
dc.subjectInvestigación socioeconómicaen_US
dc.subjectPobrezaen_US
dc.titleWhat is the Role of Urban Growth on Inequality, and Segregation? The Case of Urban Argentina´s Urban Agglomerationsen_US
dc.typeworkingPaperen_US
dc.publisher.cityBuenos Airesen_US


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

CC-BY-NC
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como CC-BY-NC